Page 58 - North American Clean Energy March/April 2020 Issue
P. 58

wind power
Breathing Life into Older Wind Turbines
by Nic Waters
a lot of the operating wind fleet in North America, owners of aging equipment have been faced with a vast array of challenges while continuing to operate their turbines in their current state. This has led to lost revenue and ever-increasing operational spending. Challenges surrounding spare parts availability, along with severely restricted access to turbine data and parameters, limited input/output channels, obsolete SCADA platforms, and inconsistent OEM support, have driven a strong market demand for a 3rd party controls retrofit solution. As these turbines age, operating them in their original state (without modifications or upgrades) becomes more and more costly, further demonstrating the urgency for a viable controls retrofit solution.
No Intervention, a Losing Proposition
Owner/operators self-performing sites with some of these older turbines are finding it costly to maintain the current control systems. Replacing the control boards can result in costs over $20,000 per turbine (if both up-tower and down-tower controls fail). While some of these owners have supply agreements in place and are able to avoid direct hardware costs, they can still face excessive indirect costs due to spare parts lead times. Even if warranty contracts include replacing control boards, they fail to protect owners from losing revenue due to downtime caused by lengthy spare parts lead times for these replacement components; procuring control boards for some turbines can lead to downtimes exceeding 6 weeks.
A controls retrofit can update your turbines in line with most modern turbine manufacturers; modular PLC systems are utilized, individual components can be replaced for as little as a few hundred dollars, and replacement components are readily available.
As the wind industry matures, using advanced analytics for more informed decision making continues to gain traction. By analyzing large data sets pulled from modern sites, operators are able to identify subtle deficiencies in turbine performance and take corrective actions, which translate to significant AEP gains. Limited access to turbine data and parameters for older turbines makes these analytics challenging to perform, if not altogether impossible. Additionally, their restrictive nature creates problems for technicians maintaining these turbines. Cumbersome and extremely restrictive SCADA systems utilized at these sites create unnecessary operational challenges, and present potential issues with satisfying future regulations mandated by local grid reliability councils. With the weak link in the chain for older turbines being the turbine controller and control software, 3rd party SCADA overlays may be able to provide a more user-friendly graphical interface, but will continue to suffer from the issue of restricted data access, due to being limited to the data available on the existing controller. A simple SCADA upgrade is not a viable

   56   57   58   59   60